Post by Robert MilesPost by k***@gmail.comThe environmental protection agency lists the maximum safe exposure to mercury as 0.1 micrograms, per kilogram, per day.
I weigh 40 kilograms. That means for one day, my maximum safe exposure would be 4.0 micrograms per day.
In the interest of finally settling this ridiculous debate, I am volunteering myself to have 4.0 micrograms of thiomersal injected into my body every day for one month.
If I do not develop significant neurodegenerative effects from this exposure, which is thousands of times more mercury compound than is in a standard vaccination, it will be empirically proven that vaccines cannot be toxic in this way.
If anyone wishes to assist with this study, please contact me. This is an issue that may someday lead to a pandemic, and in the interests of the global medical community, I am willing to use my own body as a physical proof that this is not dangerous.
I have examined the data most completely, and determined that I should suffer no detrimental effect insofar as neurotoxicity or bioaccumulative degeneration of neuronal pathways. I consider this akin to Dr. Barry Marshall ingesting bacteria to prove that ulceration is caused by a microbe, not stressors.
I eagerly await the reply of the scientific community.
Note that thimerosal is not all mercury, so 4.0 micrograms of thimerosal is not 4.0 micrograms of mercury.
Thimerosal is only one component of vaccines; it leaves out the weakened virus component. Are you planning another month with injections of only the weakened virus component?
The research that allegedly found that mercury-based adjuvants, such as thimerosal, are safe, actually found only that they are no worse than the aluminum-based adjuvants used in some vaccines. Are you planning a third month with injections of some aluminum-based adjuvant?
Your test would show only that thimerosal is safe for one adult, without testing on enough people to show that it is safe for all adults.
Consider thalidomide as a medicine shown to be safe for adults, and then used enough to show that it is definitely unsafe for children not born yet. Look up "thalidomide babies" for details. Why would showing that thimerosal is safe for adults show that it is safe for children? Or are you still a child?
I've seen some recent research articles saying that autism in children can be predicted fairly reliably by testing their mother's blood during pregnancy for certain antibodies to the unborn child's brain. This is enough like autoimmunity to imply that the unborn child's brain proteins, and the mother's antibodies, leak through the placenta. Are you planning to be pregnant during this test?
Companies that make vaccines would be likely places to get the items to inject, but getting any financial aid from them would leave your results open to people saying that the vaccine company biased the results. Are you prepared to avoid this?
I am prepared to take every risk any anti-vaxxer says will kill me or turn me autistic, and double it. I am a transgender woman, I cannot be pregnant.
I will not answer your speculation with further speculation. Give me a list of the scary things that make vaccines dangerous. I will even purchase a "lot" (crate or whatever) of the vaccine considered most dangerous, and take a double dose of that daily. I will take video evidence, have a third party monitor my health and I will take notes myself.
If this is insufficient for you, I cannot help but wonder if the power you believe in themselves told you that it were safe.
Also, my test would show that levels of thiomersal hundreds of times greater than anti-vaxxers claim to be dangerously toxic, to be utterly harmless.
I'll even give you blood samples yourself so you can analyze it spectrographically, to confirm presence of mercury.
I'm no pawn, I'm willing to put my life on the line to prove this. My question is this: If your child were unvaccinated, would you be willing to expose her to measles because she should be able to fight it off with water or some other homeopathic "treatment"? If your child died from measles, would you believe that it's the agenda of "Big Pharma" to kill just enough children that people believe in vaccines?
I'd like to point out that you don't "believe" in science, you follow the scientific method to determine accurate data. If you "believe" that vaccines are dangerous, without any substantiating proof, it is faith. I have a hypothesis that I can test.
If I get sick directly from mercury exposure or antigen exposure or mouse brain exposure, I will put that in my data. Conversely, if I do not, I will put that in my data.
I'm unbiased as to this, I simply seek to test my theories and determine facts through the scientific method. I do not put faith in things that cannot be confirmed.
I will fund this entirely myself, to avoid any bias whatsoever. I will provide financial records of the supplies I purchase.
There will be complete and total transparency, all data recorded will be published and if I am wrong, I will admit it.
Are we square?