On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:04:31 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, Reg
Post by Reg GriswoldPost by Bob OfficerOn Sun, 04 Aug 2013 10:14:12 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, Woody
Post by WoodyPost by Reg GriswoldVaccines, Autism and Gulf War Syndrome
http://rense.com/general67/vacc.htm
"Unfortunately, the science supporting the safety of unlimited
vaccination of small children and adults does not exist. "
Oh no . . . another link to rense . . . when will it end?
carole doesn't understand science . . . she's can't possibly know!
IIRC GWS, was suspected to be caused by a infection carried by a sand
mite. The parasite was carried on the skin and the belongings of
returning GIs. The infections then spread to family members, carried
by the mites.
Post by Woodycarole <-- the blind attempting to lead the blind
http://rense.com/general67/vacc.htm
"Unfortunately, the science supporting the safety of unlimited
vaccination of small children and adults does not exist."
rense? The same source which claims the Queen of England is a
reptile? Have you no shame carole?
http://www.google.com/search?q=everything+in+the+internet+is+true
http://everythingontheinternetistrue.com/
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Proof_that_everything_on_the_internet_is_true
Post by Reg Griswoldhttp://www.tetrahedron.org/articles/gulf_war_syndrome/GWS_and_Vaccines.html
"French troops, who did not receive the same massive drug cocktails as
their American and British counterparts, have not suffered the same
incidence of Gulf war syndrome. "
The causal agent of GWS initially and until about 1998 was thought to
be a parasite transmited by a small mite.
Post by Reg Griswoldhttp://www.asanltr.com/ASANews-97/poxvaccines.htm
"A number of troops who were not sent to the conflict, but who were
injected with the same group of vaccines, have shown the same symptoms
and trends as those claiming to have the GWS. The troops were
designated as backups that were prepared, but never deployed.
"Prior to these reports, many people, including scientists and medical
professionals, believed that chemical exposures from distant
ammunition dumps, sporadic detection of chemical detectors and even
the extensive oil fires might be responsible for the GWS. While ASA
was in Kuwait, they spoke with several of the doctors and asked if
there was any evidence of symptoms similar to the GWS in the Kuwaiti
population. No such clustering of such symptoms has been noted, which
questions the effect of exposure to these chemicals as a cause. "
Additionally, the other possible agents were Sarin nerve gas which
was detected by British, Czech, and France. and the PB tablets used
to counteract the nerve agent rather than point to an infectious
agent.
RAC-GWVI Report 2008, p. 1 (PDF p. 11)
www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA491742
Post by Reg GriswoldPoor bob, so stuck in denial he can't even consider the possibility
that big pharma is responsible for causing disease.
http://www.fas.org/irp/gulf/cia/970409/cia_wp.html
There are several good and well written reports including one that
rules out infectious agents and points out that 125,000 us troops and
9,000 british troops were exposed to mustard gas and sarin which the
US destroyed the Iraq's ammo storage facility at Khamisiyah.
--
Bob Officer
"Whoops .... now where did I put that other braincell?
It make it very hard to work things out.
Oh, I'll check up my arse ...get back to ya."
carole hubbard in Message-ID: <f3b680d9-da69-4c7e-99b2-***@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>